Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:48

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
King Charles III pays respects to Air India crash victims at his annual birthday parade - PBS
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
49ers trade a 2026 conditional fifth-round pick for Bryce Huff - NBC Sports
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Does a person with schizophrenia hear voices?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Algorithm to analyze smartphone app data can predict MS symptoms - Multiple Sclerosis News Today
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Grandfather's simple changes reversed pre-diabetes diagnosis that left him 'petrified' - AOL.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Doloremque harum est natus ipsum quasi at atque quam.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?